PROCESS DEVELOPMENT

Performance Qualification of Automated Terminal Crimping Process for Heart-Lung Machine Production

A cardiovascular device manufacturer required documented evidence that their automated terminal crimping process using the AMP-O-lectric Model G machine for HLM (Heart-Lung Machine) cable assemblies would consistently produce product within IPC/WHMA-A-620B specifications when operated at nominal conditions across multiple production lots. The challenge involved validating automated crimping across two wire gauges (14 AWG and 22 AWG) with different terminal types and crimp height specifications. Critical concerns included ensuring the crimp fixture (Auto Crimp Applicator) setup was correct, validating the first piece article process with Precision Adjustment Lever calibration, preventing excessive or insufficient crimping through automation, and maintaining dimensional accuracy (crimp height) within tight tolerances (±0.002 inches).

Project Metrics

Total Samples450 Terminals
Pass Rate100%
Confidence Level99%
01

Problem Definition

A cardiovascular device manufacturer required documented evidence that their automated terminal crimping process using the AMP-O-lectric Model G machine for HLM (Heart-Lung Machine) cable assemblies would consistently produce product within IPC/WHMA-A-620B specifications when operated at nominal conditions across multiple production lots. The challenge involved validating automated crimping across two wire gauges (14 AWG and 22 AWG) with different terminal types and crimp height specifications. Critical concerns included ensuring the crimp fixture (Auto Crimp Applicator) setup was correct, validating the first piece article process with Precision Adjustment Lever calibration, preventing excessive or insufficient crimping through automation, and maintaining dimensional accuracy (crimp height) within tight tolerances (±0.002 inches).

02

System Constraints

ISO 13485 compliance for medical device quality management
FDA QSR requirements for process validation
IPC/WHMA-A-620B specifications for crimp terminations
Crimp fixture selection as primary critical element
Two wire gauges requiring validation: 14 AWG and 22 AWG
Tight crimp height tolerances: ±0.002 inches
Worst-case pre-mitigated risk: Intolerable
Statistical requirement: 99% confidence, 94.04% tolerance
First piece article setup required before production runs
03

Engineering Decisions

Validated two terminal/wire combinations: 14 AWG (0.076″ ± 0.002″) and 22 AWG (0.0295″ ± 0.002″)

Produced 450 total samples: 225 per wire gauge (75 per work order × 3 work orders)

Used AMP-O-lectric Model G automatic crimping machine with Auto Crimp Applicators

Implemented first piece article process: produce sample, measure, adjust Precision Adjustment Lever until within spec

Required all operators to be trained and certified to IPC/WHMA-A-620B standards

Tested both visual inspection (crimp form) and mechanical testing (crimp height)

Applied exact binomial confidence interval statistical method for tolerance analysis

Proved process capability during first piece article setup before production runs

04

Validation Strategy

  • 14 Gage Wire: 225/225 samples passed visual inspection (0 failures)
  • 14 Gage Wire: 225/225 samples passed crimp height testing (0 failures)
  • 22 Gage Wire: 225/225 samples passed visual inspection (0 failures)
  • 22 Gage Wire: 225/225 samples passed crimp height testing (0 failures)
  • Total: 450/450 samples met IPC/WHMA-A-620B specifications (100% pass rate)
  • Statistical claim validated: 94% of all units meet specifications with 99% confidence
  • Zero excessive crimps, zero insufficient crimps, zero crimp form defects detected
  • All crimp heights within ±0.002″ tolerance across all samples
  • First piece article setup process validated for ensuring process capability
05

Risk & Mitigation

Automation reduces operator variability compared to manual crimping
Mitigation:
First piece article setup with Precision Adjustment Lever ensures process capability before production
Mitigation:
Crimp fixture selection critical to process success - validated through zero defects
Mitigation:
No input parameters identified that would cause worst-case scenario
Mitigation:
Operator training to IPC standards ensures proper fixture selection and setup
Mitigation:
Automated process provides consistent crimp quality across multiple lots
Mitigation:
06

Final Outcome

Successfully qualified automated terminal crimping process for HLM production with zero defects across 450 samples spanning six work orders and two wire gauges. Demonstrated that the AMP-O-lectric Model G machine with proper Auto Crimp Applicator selection and first piece article setup using the Precision Adjustment Lever can consistently produce terminals meeting IPC/WHMA-A-620B specifications for both crimp form and crimp height. The validation established process capability with 99% confidence that 94% of all future production units will meet specifications, providing documented evidence for regulatory compliance and production release. The automated process demonstrated superior consistency compared to manual methods while maintaining the same quality standards.

Total Samples450 Terminals
Pass Rate100%
Confidence Level99%