← Back to case studies

Manufacturing Engineering

Automated Crimp Process Validation

Validation of an automated crimping process with force monitoring, process-window definition, and production-lot PQ evidence.

Crimp PressPull TesterCross-SectionMinitabIPC-620
01

Problem

A high-volume catheter assembly process required reliable electrical and mechanical crimp performance while reducing manual variability and ensuring traceable acceptance data.

02

Constraints

  • Crimp quality had to meet IPC/WHMA-A-620 expectations for high-reliability assemblies.
  • Cycle time targets required automated actuation and rapid inspection.
  • Crimp force, crimp height, and pull strength had to remain inside a defensible process window.
  • Production release required regulated validation documentation.
03

Engineering Decisions

  • Selected automated crimp equipment with integrated force monitoring.
  • Defined process-window studies around crimp height, pull force, and visual/electrical acceptance.
  • Used cross-section review to confirm conductor compression and gas-tight connection quality.
  • Established daily verification to maintain the validated state.
04

Validation

  • Performed OQ to define operating limits and nominal settings.
  • Executed PQ using production lots to demonstrate repeatability under intended use.
  • Reviewed pull-test and inspection evidence against predefined acceptance criteria.
05

Risk & Mitigation

  • Crimp-height drift could reduce connection reliability; mitigated with force monitoring and verification.
  • Wire-strand damage could create latent failures; mitigated with controlled stripping and inspection.
  • Operator setup variation could affect output; mitigated with standardized setup and documented settings.
06

Outcome

The automated crimp process was validated as a repeatable production method with reduced manual variability and stronger in-process control.

Related domain: Manufacturing Engineering

Review additional case evidence or contact VeraHex to discuss a similar engineering gap.