01
Problem
Testing high-power electromechanical control boxes introduced operator safety risks from voltage, motion, docking, and pneumatic actuation.
02
Constraints
- Power could only be applied when physical interlocks and pneumatic states were valid.
- Maintenance modes required safe access without uncontrolled hazardous energy.
- Zone status had to be visible and controlled by test logic.
- The system needed fail-safe behavior during power loss.
03
Engineering Decisions
- Implemented independent safety zones for docking, E-Stop, and fixture conditions.
- Integrated door switches, vacuum sensors, and zone-specific enable logic.
- Included UPS monitoring to support safe-state transitions.
- Defined maintenance-safe states separate from production test state.
04
Validation
- Verified interlock response under normal and fault conditions.
- Confirmed hazardous energy remained inhibited unless all permissives were satisfied.
- Tested safe-state behavior during abnormal power and fixture conditions.
05
Risk & Mitigation
- Operator exposure to voltage or pneumatic motion was mitigated with redundant interlocks.
- Unexpected power loss was mitigated with monitored transition to safe state.
- Partial-zone maintenance risk was mitigated with independent zone controls.
06
Outcome
The safety architecture reduced operator exposure and enabled controlled test execution for hazardous electromechanical equipment.