PROCESS VALIDATION

Operational Qualification of Tumbling/Deburring Process for Medical Device Components

A cardiovascular medical device manufacturer required documented evidence that their tumbling/deburring process for machined CDI components would not produce unacceptable product when operated at process extremes. The challenge involved validating multiple equipment platforms (three tumblers and one centrifuge) across varying part geometries, materials (plastic and aluminum alloys), and process parameters including run time, media type, machine agitation, and batch quantities. Critical concerns included preventing under-processing (insufficient burr removal) and over-processing (part damage or dimensional changes).

Project Metrics

Parts Validated186 Parts
Equipment Platforms4 Systems
Protocol DeviationsZero
01

Problem Definition

A cardiovascular medical device manufacturer required documented evidence that their tumbling/deburring process for machined CDI components would not produce unacceptable product when operated at process extremes. The challenge involved validating multiple equipment platforms (three tumblers and one centrifuge) across varying part geometries, materials (plastic and aluminum alloys), and process parameters including run time, media type, machine agitation, and batch quantities. Critical concerns included preventing under-processing (insufficient burr removal) and over-processing (part damage or dimensional changes).

02

System Constraints

ISO 13485 compliance for medical device quality management
FDA QSR requirements for process validation
Multiple equipment platforms requiring qualification
Varying part materials (Delrin 150 plastic, Aluminum 6061, Aluminum 6063-T5)
Complex part geometries requiring complete burr removal
Dimensional integrity requirements after tumbling
03

Engineering Decisions

Selected worst-case parts representing softest material, hardest material, and most complex geometry

Established process extremes: minimum/maximum run times (1-3 hours)

Tested minimum and maximum batch quantities

Validated with softest and standard media types

Tested lowest and highest machine agitation settings

Leveraged prior lab study (LS14412) demonstrating dimensional stability at 3-hour maximum

Implemented visual inspection test method previously validated per TMV 857089

04

Validation Strategy

  • All 186 parts successfully passed visual inspection per manufacturing work instruction
  • Under-processing worst case: Complex geometry and hardest material parts tumbled at minimum time (1 hour) with soft media passed inspection
  • Over-processing worst case: Softest material parts tumbled at maximum time (3 hours) with standard media showed no deformation or damage
  • All four equipment platforms (three tumblers, one centrifuge) qualified via Installation Qualification reports
  • Zero deviations during protocol execution
  • Visual inspection confirmed complete burr removal without dimensional impact
05

Risk & Mitigation

Identified under-processing risk: insufficient burr removal on complex geometries
Mitigation:
Identified over-processing risk: potential part damage or dimensional changes on soft materials
Mitigation:
Mitigated through worst-case testing at process extremes
Mitigation:
Lab study LS14412 provided statistical evidence of dimensional stability
Mitigation:
Installation Qualifications completed for all equipment prior to OQ execution
Mitigation:
06

Final Outcome

Successfully qualified the tumbling/deburring process across all equipment platforms with zero deviations. Demonstrated that the process operates safely within established parameters, preventing both under-processing and over-processing. The validation established a robust process window suitable for production use across 11 CDI component part numbers, providing documented evidence of process capability for regulatory compliance.

Parts Validated186 Parts
Equipment Platforms4 Systems
Protocol DeviationsZero